论文部分内容阅读
中国转型期的乡村社会情况复杂多样,仅凭政府的力量无法解决其面临的发展危机和社会问题,从而多元共治成为了基层改革的核心思路。本文在社会治理体制创新的语境下,借鉴协作治理的权变模型构建基层治理创新路径选择的分析框架,对应巫溪“乐和家园”、肃宁“四个全覆盖”和彭州“民心通”工程三个地方创新案例,讨论当前实践中以动员为基础、以补位为促进、以重构为整合三种路径的差异。本研究认为,基于不同的乡村社会结构、领导者特质和治理的制度环境,地方政府和社会以问题为导向,选择了不同的方式进行治理创新。不论哪种创新模式,只有充分的社会动员、成熟的乡村领导者的出现,并配合完善的制度设计,多元共治才能得以实现。
The situation of rural society in China’s transition period is complex and diverse, and the development crisis and social problems it faces can not be solved by the government alone. Therefore, pluralistic communists have become the core idea of grassroots reform. In the context of innovation of social governance system, this paper constructs the analysis framework of grassroots governance innovation path by referring to contingency model of collaborative governance. “Public pass ” project three local innovation case to discuss the current practice of mobilization as a basis to fill the position for the promotion, to reconstruct the integration of the three differences. This study argues that, based on different rural social structures, the characteristics of leaders and the institutional environment of governance, local governments and society are guided by the problems and have chosen different ways to carry out governance innovation. No matter what kind of innovation model, only full social mobilization, the emergence of mature rural leaders, and with the perfect system design, pluralism can be achieved.