论文部分内容阅读
在现代社会中,美术展览以其直接性,有效性的特点已经成为一种越来越重要的美术传播方式和途径。越来越成为人们文化生活的一部分。甚至成为人们文化生活水平的表征之一。邓福星研究员认为,美术展览的功能。意义的价值,主要有三点:它是沟通艺术家乃至卓越艺术家与普通大众的桥梁,是普及高雅艺术,进行社会美育的有效形式,它是艺术家向公众展示自已艺术作品,宣扬自己艺术理想并接受公众检验的直接的途径,它应该成为艺术探索,学术交流等有关艺术活动的一个中心环节。作者并就伴随美术展览而派生出的美术作品评选,评奖等问题谈了自己的见解。马鸿增研究员分析了造成我国美术馆事业目前面临的种种难题的原因,指出首要的还是社会认识问题,尤其是一些决策人士思想观念上对美术馆的地位和作用缺乏认识,同时提出学术研究是美术馆一切业务工作的前提和基础。 香港大学艺术系万青力教授提出的研究中国近现代绘画史的“三原则”,值得引起美术史论研究者的关注。曹庆晖的文章,分析了“三原则”的学术来源。使用情况及相关问题,在肯定这种历史观察方法所具有的学术张力的同时,也指出其存在的偏狭性和理想化。
In modern society, the art exhibition has become an increasingly important mode and means of art communication with its directness and effectiveness. More and more become part of people’s cultural life. And even become one of the characteristics of people’s cultural life. Researcher Deng Fuxing believes that the function of art exhibitions. The value of meaning is mainly composed of three points. It is a bridge between artist and even superior artist and the general public. It is an effective form of popularizing elegant art and conducting social aesthetic education. It is an opportunity for artists to show their works of art to the public, promote their artistic ideal and accept the public The direct way to test, it should become a center of artistic activity such as art exploration, academic exchange and so on. The author also talked about his own opinions on the selection of art works and the awarding of awards for his works accompanying art exhibitions. Researcher Ma Hongzeng analyzed the reasons that caused the current difficulties faced by the art museum in our country and pointed out that the most important issue is social awareness, especially some policy makers’ lack of understanding of the status and role of the museum. At the same time, The premise and foundation of all business work. The “Three Principles” proposed by Professor Wan Qingli, a professor of fine arts at Hong Kong University, deserves the attention of researchers in the history of art. Cao Qinghui’s article analyzes the academic sources of the “Three Principles.” Usage and related issues, while affirming the academic tension of this historical observation method, it also points out the existence of bias and idealization.