论文部分内容阅读
近年来,对中国北方地区青铜时代和早期铁器时代的研究较有分量的文章属美国学者Nicola Di Cosmo的《先秦中国北方区》〔2〕一文,作者立足于考古资料之上,以洋洋洒洒几万言,从欧亚大陆文化交流高度对北方区(从黑龙江到新疆)进行了分期以及对社会、经济的发展进行了探讨。然而,我们发现Di Cosmo对新疆地区的考古材料言之甚少。这可谓是个缺憾。新疆地区的重要性是不言而喻的:这里是文化交流的通道。中国学者对新疆汉代以前的遗迹的正式考古发掘,若以黄文弼先生1928年参加中瑞西北考察团起
In recent years, the more weighty articles on the study of the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age in northern China belong to Nicola Di Cosmo’s “Pre-Qin China Northern Quarter” [2]. The author, based on archaeological data, Made a staged discussion on the staging of the Northern District (from Heilongjiang to Xinjiang) and the social and economic development from the perspective of cultural exchanges between Eurasia and China. However, we found that Di Cosmo made very little archaeological material in Xinjiang. This can be described as a defect. The importance of Xinjiang is self-evident: here is the passage of cultural exchange. Chinese scholars on the official relics of the former relics of the Han Dynasty in Xinjiang, if Huang Wenbi took part in the delegation to Northwest China in 1928