论文部分内容阅读
我们一直认为我们的社会主义模式就是马克思预见的那种社会主义,并一度为我们能提前进入到这一历史阶段而沾沾自喜,在公平与效率问题上以绝对平均主义代替公平而牺牲效率,结果到头来还要对自己的体制进行改革.这丝毫不是马克思的错,应该检讨的是我们自己.因为马克思明白无误地讲过:“如果把我关于西欧资本主义起源的历史概述彻底变成一般发展道路的历史哲学理论,一切民族,不管他们所处的历史环境如何,都注定要走这条道路”,这样做,“会给我过多的荣誉,同时也会给我带来过多的侮辱”.走中国式的社会主义发展道路是唯一正确的结论.党的十五大报告重申了十四大提出的“效率优先,兼顾公平”的原则.这既是对建国以来经济建设实践经验的总结和反思,也是对近二十年改革开放的肯定,是科学的决策.公平与效率是现代西方经济学家首先提出的命题,在他们看来,公平与效率是难以兼顾的.如果在政治制度和社会制度上承认天赋人权,在法律制度上保证人人平等,而在经济制度上遵循物竞天择、优胜劣汰的市场法则,就无法在公平与效率之间找到一条既不损害公平又不牺牲效率的中间道路.然而,从公平与效率的原意上看,二者并不属于同一领域.公平是一个政治伦理问题,而效率则是一个经济问题.公平的对立面是不公正和不平等,效率的
We have always believed that our socialist model is the kind of socialism Marx foresees, and at one time we are complacent about our advancement into this historical stage and sacrificing efficiency on the issue of equity and efficiency by replacing absolute justice with sacrifice of efficiency. As a result, But also to reform our own system.This is not the fault of Marx and the one we should review.For Marx plainly stated: “If we completely turn the historical overview of the origin of Western European capitalism into a general development path Historical philosophical theory, all ethnic groups, are destined to go this path regardless of the historical environment in which they are located. ”In doing so,“ it will give me too much honor and bring too many insults to me. ” The only correct conclusion to follow is the Chinese way of socialist development.The principle of “giving priority to efficiency and giving consideration to fairness” put forward by the 14th National Party Congress reiterated the report of the 15th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which is both a summary and reflection on practical experience in economic construction since the founding of our nation , Which is also the affirmation of reform and opening up in the past two decades and a scientific decision. Fairness and efficiency are the first proposals made by modern western economists Proposition, in their view, fairness and efficiency are difficult to take into account.If the natural and human rights are recognized in the political system and social system, in the legal system to ensure equality for all, and in the economic system to follow the natural selection, the survival of the fittest market rules , It is impossible to find an intermediate path between fairness and efficiency that does not undermine fairness without sacrificing efficiency.However, in the original meaning of fairness and efficiency, the two do not belong to the same field.It is a political ethical issue that fairness Efficiency is an economic problem, the opposite of fairness is unfair and inequitable and efficient