论文部分内容阅读
自古以来,在什么是好的城市规划这个问题面前,建筑师已经进行了大量讨论:城市本身是正片还是底片?应该从图还是底的角度来看它?城市是先由实体构成的系统,之间留出街道、小路和场地的空间;还是由一系列空间构成、再将建筑作为第二步插入其中的?关于我们的居住地是应该从空间还是实体出发的争论,不仅让建筑师对立起来,连哲学家也是。传统的空间概念,从亚里士多德到笛卡尔、再从牛顿到海德格尔,都被认为是绝对的。根据这一概念,空间存在于且构成其自身:这个内空且无限的容器可以容纳
Since ancient times, in front of the question of what constitutes a good urban planning, architects have discussed a great deal about whether the city itself is a positive film or a negative film. It should be viewed from the bottom up or from the bottom. The city is a system of entities Space for streets, paths, and venues, or is it a series of spaces that you insert as a second step? The debate over whether our place of residence should be from space or entity not only allows architects to oppose each other Even philosophers, too. The traditional concept of space, from Aristotle to Descartes and then from Newton to Heidegger, is considered absolute. According to this concept, space exists and constitutes itself: this hollow and infinite container can accommodate