论文部分内容阅读
目的:评估使用牙间隙刷作为刷牙辅助手段去除牙菌斑和改善牙周炎症的效果,并与其它牙间隙清洁方法比较。方法检索Medline-PubMed文献库(1969-2009),对标题和摘要进行关键词筛查,选择符合入选标准的文献。牙周炎症参数涉及菌斑、牙龈炎、牙龈出血和牙周袋。结果:从202篇初筛文献中最终选出满足入选标准的文献9篇,提取数据,得到相关参数的平均值和标准差。根据数据完整性的不同,在使用牙间隙刷与仅用牙刷或牙刷加牙签之间进行描述性比较,在牙间隙刷与牙线之间进行Meta分析(荟萃分析)。结论:作为刷牙辅助手段,使用牙间隙刷比仅用牙刷能去除更多牙菌斑,牙间隙刷对菌斑指数、牙龈出血指数和牙周袋探诊深度均有显著改善作用;与使用牙线相比,大多数研究显示使用牙间隙刷对菌斑指数的改善效应更显著。
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of using an interdental brush as a brushing aid to remove plaque and improve periodontal inflammation and to compare with other methods of gap cleaning. Methods The Medline-PubMed literature library (1969-2009) was searched, keywords and abstracts were screened, and documents that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Periodontal inflammation parameters involve plaque, gingivitis, bleeding gums and periodontal pockets. Results: Ninety-two literatures that satisfied the inclusion criteria were selected from 202 screening samples and the data were extracted to obtain the mean and standard deviation of the related parameters. Based on the data integrity, a meta-analysis was performed between the interdental brush and the dental floss using a toothbrush or a toothbrush plus a toothpick. (Meta-analysis). Conclusion: As an auxiliary method of brushing, the use of tooth space brush can remove more plaque than brushing toothbrush. The interdental brush can significantly improve the plaque index, gingival bleeding index and probing depth of periodontal pocket. Most studies show that the use of interdental brush to improve the plaque index more significantly.