论文部分内容阅读
神话原型批评理论作为二十世纪三大文学批评理论之一,虽然近几十年来在国内研究者颇多,成果也很丰盛,但一个亟待澄清的问题在于:大部分研究者对弗莱的神话原型理论与弗莱泽的人类学理论以及荣格的心理学意义上的原型理论概念混淆,错误地互相指代,而且没有认识到弗莱文学批评研究的“整体性”倾向与主张。本文简明扼要地阐释了弗雷泽的文化人类学理论及荣格的原型理论对神话原型批评的影响,较为详尽地阐释了弗莱的神话原型批评理论尤其是其“整体性”文化倾向,为原型批评正名。
As one of the three theories of literary criticism in the twentieth century, mythological prototype criticism theory has many researchers and rich achievements in the country in recent decades. However, one urgent problem to be clarified is that most of the researchers’ myths about Frye Prototype theory is confused with Fletze ’s anthropological theory and Jung’ s concept of prototype theory in the sense of psychology, which falsely refers to each other and does not recognize the “wholeness” tendency and proposition of Frye ’s literary criticism. This paper illustrates briefly the influence of Fraser’s cultural anthropology theory and Jung’s prototype theory on mythological prototype criticism, and elaborates Frye’s mythological criticism theory in detail, especially his “holistic ” cultural tendency , The name of the prototype criticism.