论文部分内容阅读
2011年上海历史高考上海第34题:两张判决书在古巴比伦和古罗马,法官对同一案件的判决会大相径庭。问题:(8分)(1)这两份判决分别依据下列哪部法律?(2分)①《民法大全》②《汉穆拉比法典》判决一:________判决二:________(2)以今日之见,你觉得哪种判决较合理?说出你的理由。(6分)此题创设了一个案件的情境,是一道有关古代法律的高考试题。它通过对《汉穆拉比法典》与《民法大全》的基本法律内容的呈现,以法律为切入点,来考查学生获取有效信息并进行分析论证问题的能力,体现了能力立
Shanghai history college entrance examination in 2011 Shanghai Question 34: two verdict In ancient Babylon and ancient Rome, the judge’s decision in the same case will be very different. Questions: (8 points) (1) Which of the following laws is based on the following two judgments respectively? (2 points) ① “Civil Code” ② Code of Hamurabi Judgment 1: ________ Judgment 2: ________ (2) Today’s opinion, which one do you think is more reasonable? Say your reason. (6 points) This question creates the context of a case and is a college entrance examination exam on ancient law. It examines the ability of students to obtain valid information and analyze and prove problems through the presentation of the basic law content of the “Hammurabi Code” and “Civil Law Encyclopedia”, taking law as an entry point,