论文部分内容阅读
王晓华在《社会》2003年第5期上撰文认为,学术思想学派化是21世纪走向文化振兴的必然选择。从思想主体的工作方式来看,20世纪中国学术的一个重要欠缺是学派的极其稀少。我们在回首20世纪中国思想史时,只能说出新儒家等寥寥无几的学派。这与西方20世纪学派林立的态势形成了鲜明的对比,也与20世纪中国学术的巨大变迁不相称。总结人类思想史,不难发现:绝大多数思想创新都是在学派中产生的,从古希腊的柏拉图学派和春秋战国时期的儒家学派到当代的存在主义、结构主义、西方马克思主义,学派都是原创性的集体生产者。中国的
Wang Xiaohua wrote in “Social” No.5, 2003 that the academic thinking of the school is the inevitable choice for rejuvenating the culture in the 21st century. From the working style of the main body of thought, one of the important shortcomings of Chinese academic in the 20th century is that the schools are extremely rare. When we look back at the history of Chinese thoughts in the 20th century, we can only say very few schools such as Neo-Confucianism. This is in stark contrast to the trend of the twentieth century in the West and is also not commensurate with the great changes in Chinese academic history in the 20th century. To summarize the history of human thoughts, it is not difficult to find that the vast majority of ideological innovations are generated in schools. From the ancient Greek Platonic school and the Confucian school in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period to the contemporary existentialism, structuralism, Western Marxism and school It is an original collective producer. China’s