论文部分内容阅读
“名教”与“自然”之辩是魏晋时期政治伦理的一个中心问题,它源自汉末士人中普遍发生的儒学信念危机。王弼从“以无为本”、“崇本举末”的本体论出发,得出“名教出于自然”的结论。他否定了汉代“以仁义为本”的观念,儒道兼综,以道统儒,主张“名教”从属于“自然”。“名教出于自然”的命题,在中国伦理史上具有划时代的意义,对当代的道德教育和道德建设也具有重要的参考价值。
The debate between “nominal teaching” and “natural” is a central issue of political ethics in the Wei and Jin Dynasties. It originated from the crises of beliefs in Confucianism that were common among scholars in the late Han Dynasty. Starting from the ontology of “taking no ” as the foundation and “taking this as the last ”, Wang Bi concludes that “naming out of nature ” conclusion. He denied the Han Dynasty “based on benevolence and righteousness” concept, Confucianism and Taoism and comprehensive, Confucianism and Confucianism, advocating “nominal teach ” subordinate to “natural ”. The proposition of “teaching and learning from nature” has epoch-making significance in the history of Chinese ethics and also has important reference value to contemporary moral education and moral construction.