论文部分内容阅读
【目的】核心著者遴选与评价一直是情报研究的重要内容。为科学遴选期刊的核心著者,客观评价著者的学术影响力,展示期刊核心著者的传承和迁徙情况。【方法】以《中国科技期刊研究》为例,依据普赖斯定律和综合指数法测评该刊2006—2015年的核心著者,并与1998—2006年遴选出的核心著者进行对比。【结果】《中国科技期刊研究》2006—2015年遴选出核心著者31位;北京地区核心著者比例为48.4%;高达74.2%的核心著者来自于杂志社或期刊编辑部;有8位同时入选1998—2006年核心著者。【结论】利用综合指数法测评核心著者,与其他方法相比更具合理性;核心著者的地区分布随时间的推移变化不大,但核心著者群发生了变化,写作动机是核心著者群发生变化的决定因素,具有内在写作动机的著者才是期刊稳定的著者队伍;北京地区作为政治、文化的中心仍然是最活跃的地区;杂志社和期刊编辑部仍然是该刊核心著者最重要的来源机构。
【Objective】 The selection and evaluation of core authors has always been an important part of intelligence research. To be the core author of journals of science selection, to objectively evaluate the academic influence of authors and to show the inheritance and migration of journals’ core authors. 【Method】 Taking the “Chinese Journal of Sci-Tech Periodicals” as an example, the core authors of this issue from 2006 to 2015 were evaluated according to Price’s Law and General Index Method, and compared with the core authors selected from 1998 to 2006. 【Results】 There were 31 core authors selected from “Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals” from 2006 to 2015; 48.4% of core authors in Beijing; up to 74.2% of core authors came from magazines or periodical editorial departments; and 8 of them were enrolled in 1998 2006 core author. 【Conclusion】 It is more reasonable to use the method of comprehensive index to evaluate the core authors than the other methods. The distribution of core authors varies little with the passage of time, but the core author group changes. The writing motivation is the change of core author group Determinants and writers motivated by internal writing are the author’s stable journals; Beijing remains the most active political and cultural center; magazine and periodical editorial departments remain the most important sources of journals’ core authors.