论文部分内容阅读
这里选译的两篇文章都是兴库津科夫和李托夫所写的‘英美垄断资本在印度的争夺战’(见本刊一九五二年四十期)有开的。印度共产党总书记阿约艾·高士特地撰文对他们的文章作一重要的补充。高士特别指出现阶段美国资本的侵入印度的特质。他说明‘直到今日印度依旧是英国的半殖民地’,美国私人资本在印度尚未达到在每个工业部门都侵犯到英国资本的阶段。美国侵入印度所遇到的阻碍主要地还是日渐高涨的人民运动。他指出美国资本的侵入主要是政沿性的:企图控制印度政府,攫取印度的战略资源,并且替美国私人资本侵入印度铺平道路。另一篇是苏联作家维克托洛夫写的,也同样地补充库津科夫和李托夫意见的不充分的地方。读者可以从这两篇讨论性的文章,更进一步地理解英美在印度矛盾的实际内容。
The two articles selected for translating here are published in the battle of ’Anglo-American monopoly capital in India’ by Kuznetsov and Litov (see the 1954 issue of this issue). The general secretary of the Communist Party of India, Ayodh Ghartay, wrote an important supplement to their essay. Coats specifically pointed out the nature of the invasion of India by U.S. capital at this stage. He shows that ’India remains the British semi-colony until now,’ and the private capital of the United States in India has not yet reached the stage of encroaching on British capital in every industrial sector. The obstacles encountered by the United States in its invasion of India are mainly still the growing movement of the people. He pointed out that the invasion of U.S. capital is mainly political: attempting to control the Indian government, seizing India’s strategic resources and paving the way for the invasion of U.S. private capital into India. The other, written by Soviet writer Viktorovlv, likewise supplements the inadequacies of the opinions of Kuzinkov and Litov. From these two discussion articles, readers can further understand the actual contradictions between Britain and the United States in India.