论文部分内容阅读
这标题一经写出,白纸黑字,自己着实吓一跳。面对美术论坛中铺天盖地的“主义”流派,诸如古典主义、新古典主义、现代派、后现代派、行为艺术、观念艺术之类,我还能有自己的什么“主义”,理解还来不及哩。因为一个主义、一种流派后面总有几本书、一群人,几个研讨会,大大小小的画展,加之理论家们头头是道的演说纪要,常使我一时明白一时糊涂。我感觉思想最为混乱的时候莫过于又听说了一个新观点、新潮流、新主义,
Once this title is written, black and white, really shocked myself. In the face of the overwhelming “genre” schools in art forums, such as classicism, neoclassicalism, modernism, postmodernism, performance art, conceptual art, I can have my own “doctrine” and understand it . Because of one doctrine, there are always a few books, a group of people, several seminars, exhibitions of all sizes, both behind and behind a genre. In addition, the theoretician’s first and last words of address will often make me confused for a moment. I feel the most chaotic time than ever heard of a new point of view, the new trend, new doctrine,