论文部分内容阅读
河南农民偷逃天价过路费案引发刑法学界和司法实务界一片热议,至今本案终审判决仍未落定。本案法律适用争论主要集中于两点:一是《最高人民法院关于审理非法生产、买卖武装部队车辆号牌等刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》的地位及合法性问题;二是本案罪数形态问题。争议的司法解释属于立法机关授权司法机关进行的解释,地位相当于立法解释,且与《刑法修正案(七)》并不冲突,仍然有效。本案犯罪事实符合诈骗罪的基本构造和构成要件,在罪数形态上为牵连犯,处断上应采从一重处原则。
Henan farmers pecuniary astronomical tolls caused criminal law academia and judicial practice a hot discussion, so far the verdict of the case has not yet been finalized. The legal application of the case is mainly focused on two points: First, the Supreme People’s Court on the trial of illegal production, sale of Armed Police vehicles and other criminal cases specific application of the law to explain some of the questions on the status and legitimacy; Second, the crime count Morphological problems. The controversial judicial interpretation belongs to the explanation given by the legislature to authorize the judiciary. Its status is equivalent to that of legislative interpretation, and it does not conflict with the amendment to the Criminal Law (VII) and remains in force. The facts of the crime in this case are in line with the basic structure and elements of the crime of fraud and are implicated in the crime pattern.