论文部分内容阅读
知识产权类型多样,其可仲裁性不可划一而定。以专利为典范的某些知识产权争议由于关涉公共利益而在不同国家具有不同的可仲裁性定位。当今世界格局在知识产权可仲裁性的立场上分为激进、现实与保守三大主义。拓展知识产权的可仲裁性程度,是知识产权私权化和仲裁的私人自治二者的个别及交互要求,代表了世界发展之宏观走势。
There are various types of intellectual property rights and their arbitrability can not be decided on one by one. Some intellectual property disputes with patents as a model have different arbitrability positions in different countries because of their public interests. The current world pattern is divided into radical, realistic and conservative three mainisms in the position of intellectual property arbitrability. The degree of arbitrability of expanding intellectual property rights is the individual and interactive requirement of both the privatization of intellectual property and the private autonomy of arbitration, and represents the macro-trend of world development.