论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:很久以前读过贵刊1954年第3期登载的方若生《论李密在历史上的作用》一文,想发表几点意见.我认为这是一篇为反革命阴谋家李密出卖隋末瓦岗农民起义军的罪行回护的文章,在这篇文章中,方若生先生为讴歌李密而散布的一些思想观点,都是十分错误的.第一,李密出身于三世“皆知名当代”的贵族官僚大地主家庭,其父李宽是隋上柱国蒲山公,所以当李密还在青年时即得父阴而为左亲侍,环立于隋炀帝的殿阶之下了.后来他结识了尚书令越国公杨素与其子杨玄感,并参加了杨玄感的起兵.这次起
Editor's Comrade: Long time ago read the magazine published in the third issue of 1954, Fang Rousheng, “on the role of Li Mi in history,” a text, would like to make a few comments .I think this is a counter-revolutionary conspirator to sell Li Mi Sui Mo In this essay, some articles that Fang Ssu-sang disseminated as Acura Lee Mi are very wrong: First, Li Mi was born in the third generation of “well-known contemporary” The elite bureaucratic landlord family, whose father, Li Kuan, was the Sui Shangguo Pushan Gong, so when Li Mi was still young, she gained paternity and left paternity, standing under the palace of Sui Xuan Emperor Became acquainted with the Shangshu Ling Yue Guo Yang and his son Yang Xuan sense, and participated in the Yang Xuan sense of the army.