论文部分内容阅读
实验结果往往受实验控制条件的影响,实验条件的设置不同导致了实验结果的差异性。很大程度上,正是由于构建了类似经济人的双盲设置,博弈论专家所得出的实验结果往往会印证现代主流经济学的思维逻辑和相关理论。同时,博弈论专家之所以严格控制实验条件并热衷于双盲试验,则主要与他们的知识结构和研究对象有关,他们偏好于检测受试者在给定博弈情境下的行为逻辑,甚至对干扰因素对实验结果的影响感到不安。问题是,这种实验条件控制主要与有大量人员参与市场竞争行为比较相符,而与人们的日常生活情形相差巨大。因此,为了更好地通过实验来探索人们日常生活中的一般行为机理,就需要且可以改变实验条件,如博弈的矩阵类型、环境结构、受试者特性以及动态特性等,从而使得实验的博弈情境尽可能地接近现实环境,这是实验经济学和行为经济学的基本要求和发展方向。
Experimental results are often subject to experimental control conditions affect the experimental conditions set led to different experimental results. For the most part, precisely because of the double-blind setup of similar economic agents, the experimental results of game theory experts tend to confirm the logic and theory of modern mainstream economics. At the same time, the reason why game theory experts strictly control experimental conditions and are keen on double-blind experiments is mainly related to their knowledge structure and research objects. They prefer to test the behavior logic of subjects in a given game situation, Factors affect the experimental results uneasy. The problem is that this control of experimental conditions is mainly in line with the large number of people involved in market competition more in line with the daily life of people differ greatly. Therefore, in order to explore the general mechanism of behavior in daily life through experiments, we need and can change the experimental conditions, such as the matrix type, environmental structure, subject characteristics and dynamic characteristics of the game so that the game of the experiment Situations as close to the real environment as possible, this is the basic requirements and direction of experimental economics and behavioral economics.