论文部分内容阅读
论者从观察视角与研究方法等方面比较分析美国学者宇文所安与中国学者林庚的唐诗研究,认为前者注重从外来文化者的角度完成对中国文化的审视,更为关注唐诗中所反映出的客观现实;而后者则侧重以诗人的视角对诗歌本体进行研究。在观察视角上,林庚以诗人的目光体会唐诗中反映出的宏观时代精神,而宇文所安则以外来文化者的身份努力还原唐诗具体所反映的客观现实。在研究方法上,两位学者有许多相同点。例如,研究中都运用了史学的观念,都通过比较分析的方法凸显研究对象的特点等。两位学者在一中一西,本体意象与实证考辨方面为后人的唐诗研究提供了诸多可借鉴之处。
From the perspective of observation and research methods, the author compares and analyzes the study of the Tang poetry between the American scholar Ueju and Lin Geng, a Chinese scholar, that the former pays more attention to the examination of Chinese culture from the point of view of foreign cultures, and more attention is paid to the Tang poetry The objective reality; while the latter focuses on the poet’s perspective on the study of the body of poetry. From an observational perspective, Lin Geng realizes the macro-era spirit reflected in the Tang poetry with his poet’s eyes, and Ungu, who is a non-native cultural person, endeavors to restore the objective reality reflected in Tang poetry. In terms of research methods, the two scholars share many similarities. For example, the concept of historiography was used in the research, and the characteristics of the research object were highlighted through comparative analysis. The two scholars have provided a lot of references for the research on the later Tang poetry in the aspects of one China, one west, the noumenon image and the empirical verification.