对现行法院专递送达制度的反思

• 作 者: 熊理思
• 机 构: 上海市黄浦区人民法院,
• 出 处: 中国审判
• 发表日期: 2014年12期
• 关键词: 邮寄送达 直接送达 送达方式 司法工作人员 诉讼文书 司法适用 最高人民法院 民事诉讼法 留置送达 法律地位

自2004年最高人民法院出台《最高人民法院关于以法院专递方式邮寄送达民事诉讼文书的若干规定》以来,专递送达已成为不少法院优先适用的一种送达方式。但作为邮寄送达的一种,其在立法上仍受到“直接送达有困难”时才适用的限制。尴尬的法律地位,使法院专递送达制度在司法适用过程中产生了不少困惑。要破解这些难题,就迫切需要我们对现行制度进行反思。虽然已有不少学者、司法工作人员做过

Since the Supreme People’s Court issued the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Sending Civil Proceedings Written by Court by Courier Service” in 2004, the delivery of couriers has become the mode of delivery to which many courts are accorded priority. However, as a kind of mailing service, it is still subject to the legislative restrictions that apply only when “direct delivery is difficult”. The awkward legal status makes the delivery of court courier a lot of confusion in the process of judicial application. To crack these problems, we urgently need us to reflect on the current system. Although many scholars, judicial staff have done