中国现当代文学史料研究主体的三个“危机”

• 作 者: 付祥喜
• 机 构: 广州大学人文学院文学思想研究中心,广州大学文学思想研究中心,
• 出 处: 社会科学论坛
• 发表日期: 2016年11期
• 关键词: 现当代文学史 史料价值 文学史料 中国现代文学史 史料派 迷信研究 研究方法 古代文学 文学史研究 傅斯年

近年来,中国现当代文学史料研究越来越受到重视,但忽视了现当代文学史料研究主体存在三个“危机”:认为越古、越专、越细的文学史料越有价值;偏执于史料或理论;迷信研究方法。尽管这三个“危机”各有存在的合理性和必然性,但其危害不容忽视。

In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the research of the historical materials of Chinese modern and contemporary literature, but the main body of modern and contemporary literature has been ignored. There are three “crises”: the more historical, the more ancient, the more specialized and the finer the literary historical materials are, the more paranoid; In the history or theory; superstition research methods. Although the three “crises” each have its own rationality and necessity, its harm can not be ignored.