论文部分内容阅读
在研究依附理论的过程中,如何评价弗兰克的“不发达的发展”论,是一个无法回避的问题。弗兰克的理论究竟是什么理论,为什么弗兰克要把自己的理论称作依附理论却又遭到被他称为同行和朋友的依附论学者的严厉批判,为什么人们在研究或评价依附论时总要将弗兰克的理论同真正的依附理论相混淆,为什么人们对弗兰克的评价如此不一致,从“最早的依附论者”和“依附理论之父”,到依附论的“传播者”或“歪曲的模仿者”,最后又被看作是依附理论的否定者或反对者①。要弄清这些问题,有必要给弗兰克的“不发达的发展”论寻
How to evaluate Frank’s theory of “underdeveloped development” is an unavoidable problem in the process of studying attachment theory. Why Frank’s theory is, and why Frank called his theory dependent theory, but also severely criticized by the dependent theory scholars he and his colleagues and friends, why people in the study or evaluation of dependency theory always Frank Is confused with the true theory of attachment, and why people are so inconsistent with Frank’s evaluation that “the earliest adherents” and “the father of dependency theory” to “communicators” or “distorted imitators” Finally, it is seen as a negation or objector of dependency theory. To understand these problems, it is necessary to find Frank’s “underdeveloped development”