论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨采取日常生活干预对临界高血压的治疗效果。方法选择136例临界高血压患者随机分为观察组和对照组每组68例,观察组采用日常生活干预,对照组采用药物治疗。结果经过1 a的观察降压效果均较好,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);体重和血脂观察组下降明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组不明显差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对临界高血压患者采用日常生活干预优于药物治疗。
Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of daily life intervention on critical hypertension. Methods 136 patients with critical hypertensive patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 68 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with daily life intervention while the control group was treated with drugs. Results After 1 year of observation, the antihypertensive effect was better, and the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The body weight and blood lipid decreased significantly in the observation group (P <0.05), but there was no statistical difference in the control group Significance (P> 0.05). Conclusions Intervention for daily living in patients with critical hypertension is better than medication.