论文部分内容阅读
计划经济与商品经济,进而计划机制与市场机制,处于一种相互对立的关系,这是理论界长期存在的一种传统观点。近些年来,这种观点已有所突破,认识到与商品经济对立的是目然经济和产品经济,它们都属于经济运行形式;与计划经济对立的是资本主义雇佣经济,二者都属于社会经济制度。但是仍然存在一些混乱,一方面把市场经济与计划经济对立起来,当作一种社会经济制度对待,而不是把它当作商品经济的别称。另一方面,当现实经济运行发生混乱时,又把商品经济与计划经济对立起来,认为可与计划经济统一或结合的仅仅是作为商品经济运行机制的一部分的市场调节,而不是商品经济本身,并且认为有一个计划机制与市场机制对立,二者此消彼长,没有任何统一结合可言。这些理论混乱导致了我们在经济
The planned economy and the commodity economy, and then plan the mechanism and the market mechanism, in a mutually antagonistic relationship, which is a long-standing theoretical view of the traditional world. In recent years, this view has been a breakthrough, recognizing that with the commodity economy is the natural economy and product economy, they all belong to the form of economic operation; and the planned economy is the capitalist employment economy, both belong to the community economic systems. However, there are still some chaos. On the one hand, the market economy is opposed to the planned economy and treated as a socio-economic system rather than as another name for the commodity economy. On the other hand, when the real economy is in turmoil, the commodity economy is again opposed to the planned economy. The unification or combination with the planned economy is merely the market adjustment as part of the operation mechanism of the commodity economy, not the commodity economy itself. And think that there is a plan mechanism and the market mechanism of opposites, the two defuse each other, there is no unity at all. These theoretical chaos have caused us in the economy