论文部分内容阅读
麻省理工学院（MIT）的一篇长达七十一页的报告断定:“带电粒子束武器似乎并不比当初所构想的巴克·罗杰斯（Buck Rogers）手中的那种武器更临近一些。”该报告是由研究国际安全的科技小组（设在麻省理工学院物理系）整理,并得到了福特基金会的支持。 该报告是在有几个权威曾推测苏联已在带电粒于束用作武器的工作方面取得了突破的时候公布的。美国的出版界曾在一系列文章中要大家相信,苏联在带电粒子束技术方面已迈出很大的一步。还报导了苏联在采用带电粒子束武器对付美国洲际导弹方面的进展。此外,美国前任空军情报局局长乔治J.基根少将甚至已确认苏联在该技术领域中已遥遥领先,并能在一九八一年部署这种粒子束武器了。
A 71-page report from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) concludes: “Charged particle beam weapons do not seem to be closer to the kind of weapon that Buck Rogers originally envisioned.” The report was compiled by a science and technology group (Department of Physics at MIT) studying international security and supported by the Ford Foundation. The report was released at a time when several authorities have speculated that the Soviet Union has made a breakthrough in its work on the use of charged particles as a weapon. In a series of articles, the publishing industry in the United States has convinced everyone that the Soviet Union has taken a big step toward charged particle beam technology. The Soviet Union also reported on the progress made by the Soviet Union in using charged particle beam weapons to deal with the U.S. intercontinental missile. In addition, Major General George J. Kigen, the former director of the Air Forces of the United States, has even confirmed that the Soviet Union is far ahead of the technology and is able to deploy the particle beam weapon in 1981.