论文部分内容阅读
目次一、贿赂犯罪“计赃量刑”模式之立法缺陷及其改进二、贿赂犯罪“情节+数额”模式之司法认定就我国刑法关于经济犯罪或者贪利性犯罪的规定来说。将犯罪数额作为定罪量刑的决定性因素是立法的一个突出特点。~①而刑法中贿赂犯罪的刑罚配置亦莫能外。以受贿罪为例,中国刑法第386、383条将受贿罪根据受贿数额的不同区分为四种情形,并设置了由重至轻的相应法定刑幅度。在不同的情形下.则又根据情节的轻重严重程度配置了两种法定刑幅度。就此而论,我国刑法理论普遍认为,作为我国刑
Second, bribery crime “plot + amount ” mode of judicial determination of China ’s criminal law on economic crimes or crimes of aggression and profiteering. The decisive factor in the criminalization of the crime as a measure of conviction is a prominent feature of legislation. ~ ① Criminal penalties in the crime of bribery are not foreign. Taking bribery as an example, Article 386 and Article 383 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China categorize bribery offenses into four situations according to the amount of bribes taken and set the corresponding range of statutory sentences from light to light. In different circumstances, two kinds of statutory penalties are also allocated according to the severity of the plot. In this connection, the theory of criminal law in our country generally considers it as a criminal punishment in our country