论文部分内容阅读
本书致力于探讨马克思与黑格尔在“历史观念”上的基本差别,但首先强调深入理解黑格尔哲学的重要性。作者认为,只有充分尊重和理解黑格尔哲学,才可能透过二者在方法与主题上的相似之处,看到马克思对黑格尔哲学的批判所具有的理论意义和实践意义:对黑格尔哲学的批判,既是对西方形而上学传统的批判,也是对现代性社会本身的批判,“历史观念”的差别绝不仅仅是对同一个事实的不同解释,毋宁说恰恰是“事情本身”的差别,是人类生存原则的历史性差别;这种生存原则之差别的现实过渡,或者说马克思哲学对黑格尔哲学的真正克服,须得依靠从“世界历史”去向“人类社会”的共产主义运动来完成。
This book devotes itself to exploring the basic differences between Marx and Hegel in “history ”, but first emphasizes the importance of in-depth understanding of Hegel’s philosophy. The author believes that only by fully respecting and understanding Hegel’s philosophy can we see the theoretical and practical significance of Marx’s criticism of Hegel’s philosophy through the similarities between the two in methods and topics: Criticism of Gell’s philosophy is not only a critique of the tradition of Western metaphysics, but also a critique of the modern society itself. The difference between “historical ideas” is not merely a different interpretation of the same fact, but rather just a “matter” Itself “is the historic difference of the principle of human existence; the actual transition of the difference between these principles of existence, or the real overcoming of Hegel’s philosophy by Marxist philosophy, must rely on the transition from ” world history “Human society ” communist movement to complete.