论文部分内容阅读
据统计,近20年来,我国商品受到一些国际组织和国家的近400起倾销指控,针对中国的反倾销案件已给我国造成的损失累计约近100亿美元。 反倾销说到底是个经济层面上的问题,是国际贸易中的正常现象,可以说有市场经济就有贸易纠纷,就有倾销与反倾销的矛盾。近年来,针对我国商品的反倾销调查大幅增加,一方面是国际贸易领域竞争激烈,全球经济不景气,贸易保护主义抬头,反倾销作为世贸组织允许的自我保护手段,被一些国家滥用。另一方面我国外贸出口迅猛增长,容易引起一些国家对我国产品的重视,要保护自己的民族产业。 不过,针对我国产品的倾销指控如此之多,已超出了正常的范畴。中国企业被指控倾销是输在起点上,一开始就被置于不平等的位置,事先就被假定为“有罪”,要打赢反倾销官司,就必须花费更多的时间、精力和金钱来证明自己“无罪”,高昂的“证明费用”使企业无力承受,而且一拖就是很长时间。即使能够打赢官司,企业竞争力也会被削弱,于是企业往往放弃应诉。而如果不应诉,放弃打官司,实际上给国外反倾销调查团、调查机关提供了借口,企业往往会被征收极高的反倾销税,最终丢掉出口市场。另外,我国的行业协会等中介组织在协调企业行动上也有所欠缺。此外,导致对华倾销指控增多还与一些国内企业未按国际惯例出牌?
According to statistics, in the recent 20 years, nearly 400 dumping charges have been imposed on China’s goods by some international organizations and countries, and about 10 billion U.S. dollars have been lost for China’s anti-dumping cases. In the final analysis, anti-dumping is an economic issue and a normal phenomenon in international trade. It can be said that there are trade disputes in the market economy and contradictions between dumping and anti-dumping. In recent years, the anti-dumping investigations on our products have risen sharply. On the one hand, the competition in the field of international trade has been fierce. The global economic downturn and the rise of trade protectionism, as a means of self-protection permitted by the WTO, are being abused by some countries. On the other hand, the rapid growth of China’s foreign trade exports will easily lead some countries to attach importance to our products and protect their own national industries. However, so much accusation of dumping against our products goes beyond the normal category. Chinese enterprises are accused of dumping is lost at the starting point, the beginning was placed in an unequal position, prior to be assumed as “guilty”, to win anti-dumping lawsuit, we must spend more time, energy and money to prove Owing to their “innocence” and the high “burden of proof” that the enterprise can not afford, it is a long time to drag it. Even win the lawsuit, the competitiveness of enterprises will be weakened, so companies often give up responding. If you do not respond, give up the lawsuit, in fact, to the foreign anti-dumping investigations, investigation agencies provide an excuse, enterprises tend to be imposed a very high anti-dumping duties, and ultimately discarded the export market. In addition, China’s trade associations and other intermediary organizations in the coordination of corporate actions are also lacking. In addition, the increase in allegations of dumping against China is also linked to the failure of some domestic enterprises to issue cards in accordance with international practice.