论文部分内容阅读
‘俞平伯先生二十年代初對《紅樓夢》研究是有開拓性意義的。對他的研究方法和觀點提出不同意見,是正常的。但一九五四年下半年對他的政治性圍攻是不正確的,不符合共產黨制定的“百花齊放,百家爭鳴”的方針。’‘《紅樓夢》有多少傳記成份,怎樣評價《紅樓夢》等問題,只能通過學術討論來解决。學術界的自由討論是受中國憲法保護的。共產黨對這類學術問題不需要也不應該作出裁决。一九五四年因為有人對俞先生的紅學研究有不同意見,而對他進行政治性批判,不僅傷害了俞先生的感情,也對學術界產生了不
Yu Pingbo early 20’s on the “Dream of Red Mansions” is of pioneering significance. It is normal to have different opinions on his research methods and opinions. However, his political siege in the second half of 1954 is not correct and does not conform to the policy of “letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend” formulated by the Communist Party. How many biographies of “A Dream of Red Mansions” can be used to evaluate issues such as “Dream of Red Mansions” can only be solved through academic discussions. Free discussion in academia is protected by the Chinese constitution. The Communist Party does not need and should not rule on such academic issues. In 1954, because of the disagreement on Yu’s red-school study, political criticism of him not only harmed the feelings of Yu but also had no bearing on academia