论文部分内容阅读
目前在我国刑法学界,关于刑法解释方法论的争议主要是围绕实质解释论与形式解释论展开的。实质解释论与形式解释论的对立最早发端于德日刑法学,但当下我国刑法学界所讨论的两种解释论又有其新的内涵与范畴。笔者在本文将对实质解释论与形式解释论的初识焦点、在我国刑法学界新的发展以及两者之对立进行解读,以期在刑法解释的进路上作出合理的选择。
At present in China’s criminal law scholars, the controversy on the methodology of interpretation of criminal law is mainly centered on substantive interpretation theory and formal interpretation theory. The contradiction between substantive interpretation theory and formal interpretation theory originated in German and Japanese criminal law, but the two interpretative theories discussed by Chinese criminal law scholars have their new connotation and category at the moment. In this paper, I will focus on the first understanding of substantive interpretation and formal interpretation, the new development of criminal jurisprudence in our country and the antinomy between the two, with a view to make a reasonable choice on the way of interpretation of criminal law.