论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨两种干预方案对流产妇女避孕知识、态度的影响及其影响因素。方法:采取以医院为基础的干预性实验研究方法。结果:接受全面干预的人群避孕知识得分(9分)高于接受基本干预(7分)的人群(Z=16.6,P<0.01)和干预前(8分)的人群(Z=12.7,P<0.01);接受基本干预的人群避孕知识得分不比干预前高(Z=1.5,P=0.14)。全面干预组流产后愿意使用和准备使用避孕套避孕的比例最高,三组比较差异有统计学意义。Logistic回归分析结果表明,去除了其它变量对避孕知识得分的影响后,年龄越大、出生在城市、女方及其男伴教育水平越高和接受全面干预的人群避孕知识得分也越高。结论:提供流产后计划生育服务的全面干预能提高流产妇女的避孕知识水平和避孕药具使用率;年龄、本人及男伴文化程度和出生地是避孕知识的影响因素。
Objective: To explore the impact of two intervention programs on contraception knowledge and attitudes of abortion women and its influencing factors. Methods: A hospital-based interventional experimental study was adopted. Results: The contraceptive knowledge score (9 points) of the population receiving full intervention was higher than that of the population receiving basic intervention (7 points) (Z = 16.6, P <0.01) and before intervention (8 points) 0.01). The contraceptive knowledge scores of the population receiving basic intervention were not higher than those before intervention (Z = 1.5, P = 0.14). The proportion of women who were willing to use and ready to use condom contraception after full abortion was significantly higher than that of the control group. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that, after removing the influence of other variables on the score of contraceptive knowledge, the higher the age, the higher the education level of female and male partner and the higher the contraceptive knowledge score of population receiving full intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive intervention in providing post-abortion family planning services can improve the contraceptive knowledge and contraceptive use rate of abortion women; and age, self-abatement and male partner education and birthplace are the influencing factors of contraception knowledge.