论文部分内容阅读
文章认为,从理论上看,马克思、恩格斯并没有明确地把计划经济视为社会主义、共产主义的特征;从实践中看,社会主义国家既有计划也有市场,资本主义国家既有市场也有计划。因此,计划与市场既不姓“社”,也不姓“贸”,而是姓“中”(即中性概念)的经济调节手段。但是,一些人囿于传统理论的束缚,不敢正视现实,继续把计划与市场分别贴上“社会主义”和“资本主义”的标笺,留恋计划而惧怕市场。在理论概况上,一时是计划与市场相结合,一时是计划调节与市场调节相结合,一时是计划经济为主、市场调节为辅,一时是计划经济与市场调节相结合,弄得人莫明其妙。更无法操作运行。基于计划和市场都是经济调节手段的认识,文章认为可以将我国的经济性质概括为“社会主义商品经济”。但是,决定我国整个经济运动的不是商品而是市场,因此,从更准确地反映我国经济的本质来看,应称之为“政府宏观调控下的社会主义市场经济”。
The article holds that in theory, Marx and Engels did not explicitly regard planned economy as the characteristic of socialism and communism. In practice, the socialist countries have both planned and market, and the existing market and capitalist countries have planned . Therefore, plans and markets are neither “social” surnames nor “trade” surnames, but rather surrogate means of economic adjustment of “middle” (ie, neutral). However, some people are not bound by the traditional theory and are not willing to face the reality. They continue to put plans and markets on the banners of “socialism” and “capitalism,” and nostalgia for the plan and fear of the market. In the theory of the general situation, the temporary combination of planning and market, sometimes a combination of planning and market regulation, sometimes a planned economy, supplemented by market regulation, sometimes a combination of planned economy and market regulation, confusing people Its wonderful. More unable to operate. Based on the understanding that both planning and market are the means of economic adjustment, the article holds that the economic nature of our country can be summed up as “the socialist commodity economy.” However, it is not commodities but markets that determine the entire economic movement in our country. Therefore, judging from the more accurate reflection of the essence of our economy, we should call it the “socialist market economy under the macro-control of the government.”