龚建平案引起的思考

• 作 者: 自承君 魏志坚
• 机 构: 中国政法大学,中国政法大学 北京 100088,北京 100088
• 出 处: 法学杂志
• 发表日期: 2003年05期
• 关键词: 诉讼程序 刑事程序 国家工作人员 辩护方 控诉方 玩忽职守罪 当事人主义 控方 有罪判决 建平

足球裁判龚建平案件引起各方关注,尤其是法院最终将龚建平作为特殊的国家工作人员主体适用刑罚,引起诸多质疑。在刑事程序上,从“企业人员受贿罪”的起诉罪名到“受贿罪”的判决罪名的变更,即诉审同一性的不充分实现问题,是否导致刑事诉讼程序的不公正,从而导致刑事诉讼的实体的不公正?对这一问题,我们有必要加以深入研究。

Football referee Gong Jianping case aroused the attention of all parties, especially the court eventually Gong Jianping as a special national staff to apply the penalty, aroused many questions. In the criminal procedure, the change from the accusation of “accepting bribes by enterprises” to the change of the accusation of “accepting bribes”, that is, the inadequate realization of the identity of prosecution, leads to the injustice of the criminal procedure and leads to criminal proceedings Of the unjust entity? To this question, we need to be further studied.