论文部分内容阅读
刑法是由规則和原则组成的规范体系,基本原则具有确定规則內涵、化解规则冲突、避免规則不公的规范效力。在价值取向多元的背景下.解释者如何能够经由理性的讨论.就具体的价值判断问题寻求相互理解.进而达成价值共识,这就是刑法解释需要直面回答的问题。其中,刑法基本原則就构成了达成价值共识的基准,解释者应该以基本原则的价值共识为前提.确立相应的实体性解释规则。当出现规則模糊、规則冲突或规则不公之时,需要把刑法的三大基本原則作为刑法解释的基准,并综合运用扩大解释、限制解释与目的解释等方法,确保刑法解释结论的正确性。
Criminal law is a normative system composed of rules and principles. The basic principles have the normative effect of determining the connotation of the rules, resolving the conflict of rules and avoiding unfair rules. In the context of diversified value orientation, the interpreter can seek the mutual understanding through the rational discussion on the specific value judgments, and then reach the consensus on the value. This is the question that the criminal law interpretation needs to answer directly. Among them, the basic principles of the criminal law constitute the basis for reaching consensus on the value, the interpreter should be based on the value of the basic principles of consensus as the premise to establish the corresponding substantive rules of interpretation. When there are fuzzy rules, irregular rules or unfair rules, it is necessary to regard the three basic principles of criminal law as the benchmark for the interpretation of criminal law and to make comprehensive use of such methods as expanding the explanation, restricting the interpretation and the purpose of explanation, and ensuring the correctness of the interpretation of the criminal law.