论文部分内容阅读
儒法两家可谓渊源甚深。在孔子创儒家之前,“儒”作为一个极大的概念早已存在,它所独有的关怀精神对于先秦知识分子有着深远的影响,即便是在战国时期文化界百花齐放,儒的精神依然渗透于各派之中而非儒家独有,前期法家的代表如李悝、吴起等人也都算得上是一介大儒。如果说这对于证明儒家与法家的渊源有些牵强的话,那么这种渊源在韩非子身上就体现得再明显不过了。作为荀子的学生,韩非本该成为儒家思想的后继者,可他却成了法家的集大成者,这固然不是说法家包含于儒家,但两家在发展进程中存在交叉点是必然的。不过,在管理思想方面,两家还是分歧比较大,异多于同。本文就从几个方面做一下比较。
Confucianism and law can be described as deep two sources. Before Confucius founded Confucianism, “Confucianism” existed as a great concept. Its unique spirit of care had a far-reaching impact on the intellectuals in Pre-Qin period. Even in the flourishing cultural circle of the Warring States period, Confucianism still permeated Among the various factions rather than Confucianism, the representatives of the early legalists, such as Li Xun and Wu Qi, are regarded as monuments. If this is a little far-fetched proof of the origins of Confucianism and legalism, then such a source would be obvious to Hanfeizi. As a student of Xunzi, Han Fei should not become a successor to Confucianism, but he became a master of the legal family. Although this is not to say that the legalists are included in Confucianism, it is inevitable that the two should cross each other in their development process. However, in terms of management thinking, the two are still quite different, more than different. This article from a few aspects to make a comparison.