论文部分内容阅读
非法证据排除是刑事司法中的重要环节,特别是排除程序中证明制度设置的是否科学、合理直接影响到对案件的定性。今年刚刚实施的新《刑事诉讼法》对非法证据排除过程中的证明问题作了一些规定,体现了我国刑事证据制度改革的方向,实现了历史性的突破。但在证明对象的界定,证明责任的分配,证明标准的设置上还缺乏有效的可操作性,本文立足于此,对证明制度实施中的一些困境进行了分析,并以保障人权为核心价值取向,兼顾比例原则,就进一步加强证明制度的可操作性进行了初步探索。
Exclusion of illegal evidence is an important part of criminal justice. In particular, it is scientific and reasonable to directly influence the characterization of a case in the procedure of excluding evidences. The new “Criminal Procedure Law” just implemented this year provides some provisions on the proof in the process of excluding illegal evidence, which reflects the direction of the reform of criminal evidence system in our country and has achieved a historic breakthrough. However, there is still a lack of effective operability in the definition of the object of proof, the distribution of the burden of proof, and the setting of the standard of proof. Based on this, this paper analyzes some difficulties in the implementation of the certification system and takes the protection of human rights as the core value orientation , Taking into account the principle of proportionality, a preliminary exploration was made on further enhancing the operability of the certification system.