论文部分内容阅读
在《邓小平文选》第三卷中始终贯穿着作者敢于创新的精神。学习和研究邓小平同志这一精神,对于深刻理解建设有中国特色社会主义理论,发展马列主义、毛泽东思想,开创有中国特色社会主义的新局面,具有重大的现实意义和理论意义。 一、以科学求实的态度,正确对待 和评价毛泽东思想 众所周知,怎样认识毛泽东思想是一个重大的原则问题。长期以来,毛泽东同志和毛泽东思想在全党和全国人民中享有崇高的威望。但是,毛泽东在晚年确实犯过错误,特别是错误地发动了“文化大革命”。在70年代中后期的政治环境中要做到公正、科学地对待毛泽东思想,决不是一件容易之事。粉碎“四人帮”后,党中央作出全面拨乱反正的正确决策。然而这时,一方面,社会上出现了从根本上否定毛泽东思想的倾向,一些具有资产阶级自由化思想的人,乘机攻击毛泽东和毛泽东思想;另一方面,党内又有些人站在“左”的立场上,无视毛泽东的晚年错误,提出要坚持“两个凡是”。针对这两种错误态度,邓小平同志以过人的政治胆识和科学的求实态度,旗帜鲜明地提出要正确对待毛泽东思想,要把毛泽东思想作为一个科学体系全面准确地力。以把握,要在继承的同时创造性地发展毛泽东思想。
In the third volume of Deng Xiaoping’s anthology, the author always runs through the author’s courage to innovate. Studying and studying Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s spirit has great practical and theoretical significance for deeply understanding the theory of building socialism with Chinese characteristics, developing Marxism-Leninism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, and creating a new situation of socialism with Chinese characteristics. I. A Scientific and Pragmatic Attitude towards Correct Handling and Appraisal of Mao Zedong Thought It is a major issue of principle to understand Mao Zedong Thought. For a long time, Comrade Mao Zedong and Mao Zedong Thought enjoyed a high prestige among the entire Party and the people throughout the country. However, Mao Zedong did indeed make mistakes in his later years, and in particular, mistakenly launched the “Cultural Revolution.” It is by no means an easy task to treat the Mao Zedong Thought impartially and scientifically in the political environment in the mid-to-late 1970s. After smashing the “Gang of Four,” the Central Party Committee made the correct decision to completely straighten out the order of disregard. However, at this time, on the one hand, there appeared a trend in society that denied Mao Tse-tung’s thought fundamentally. Some people with the idea of bourgeois liberalization took the opportunity to attack Mao Tse-tung and Mao Tse-tung’s thought. On the other hand, some people in the Party stood on the left On the standpoint of disregarding Mao Zedong’s mistakes in his later years, he proposed to adhere to “two common ways.” In response to these two erroneous attitudes, Comrade Deng Xiaoping, with his extraordinary political courage and scientific and realistic attitude, clearly proposed to correctly treat Mao Tse-tung’s thought and regard it as a comprehensive and accurate force in a scientific system. To grasp, we should creatively develop Mao Zedong Thought while we inherit it.