论文部分内容阅读
近年来兴起的知识语境论主张,知识归赋语句的真值随语境而变,藉此解释人们因语境因素的改变而从知识归赋转为知识否定的直觉。然而,尽管知识语境论备受追捧,却也受到了恒定论、相对论及对照论等各派学者的挑战。文章通过汲取语义学/语用学界面研究成果,提倡从这种界面的视角表征知识归赋语句的性质与特点,既不否认语用因素对语义内容的充实,又不将知识归赋语句表达的语言意义与讲话者做出知识断言所传达的语用含义混为一谈,从而为一种语用恒定论做出论辩。
In recent years, the rise of knowledge context theory advocates that the truth value of knowledge-endowed sentences changes with the context to explain people’s intuition of changing from contextual knowledge to negative knowledge because of the change of contextual factors. However, although the theory of knowledge context is highly sought after, it is also challenged by various scholars such as the theory of constant theory, relativity and the theory of cf. By drawing on the research results at the interface of semantics and pragmatics, the article advocates the characterization and characterization of knowledge-based sentences from the perspective of such an interface. It does not deny the enrichment of semantic content by pragmatic factors, Is confused with the pragmatic meaning conveyed by the speaker making the knowledge assertion, thus arguing for a pragmatic constant theory.