论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院和最高人民检察院刑事指导性案例迄今共17个。通过文本分析发现,一部分案例确有助于解决司法疑难,但也发现很多问题:政策性案例过多,释法性案例不足,部分案例选择不当;案例文本对案情介绍不充分;与案例相关的诉讼文书及主要证据亟需专门公开;发布者对文本的编辑权限亟需界定;高检案例“要旨”部分在进行事实上的刑事立法;高检选择下级法院裁判生效的案例作为指导案例,侵犯了法院的裁判权。未来案例的选择、编辑及公开,需做大量改革,以使其更好地发挥指导功能。
The Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate criminal guidance so far a total of 17 cases. Through textual analysis, it is found that some cases do help to solve judicial problems. However, many problems have also been discovered: too many policy cases, inadequate legal interpretation cases, inappropriate choice of some cases, inadequate introduction of case reports to cases, and case-related Prosecutors and major evidence of the need for special public; publishers of text editing rights urgently need to define; high case “” essence "part of the de facto criminal legislation; High Prosecutors choose the lower court judge effective case as a guide case , Violated the court’s jurisdiction. The selection, editing and disclosure of future cases need to be drastically reformed so that they can give better guidance.