论文部分内容阅读
一、被代表的民意从“自媒体”或称“社会化媒体”诞生时起,这些传播技术平台与“人民”的结合就被看做一个天然的过程,认为微博等开放平台上的意见构成了“没有权力的大多数”对特权阶层的挑战。因而,任何以正当性借口干涉网络自由、限制网络发言(包括谣言)的行为都被视为“反人民”的、邪恶的专制行为,网络论坛上对社会议题的主流判断往往被直接等同于“公意”。然而,事实真的如此吗?本文以新浪微博中关于“吴英案”的讨论为例,在这些讨论中,大部分内容都来自通过新浪认证的加“V”用户,而转发这些认证用户的发言是新浪微博内容生产的
I. Representative Public Opinions The combination of these platforms for communication technology and “people” has been viewed as a natural process since the birth of “self-media” or “social media” Opinions on other open platforms constitute a challenge to the privileged class “majority without power.” Therefore, any attempt to interfere in the freedom of the Internet on the pretext of justification, and to restrict online statements (including rumors), are considered as “anti-people” and evil dictatorships. The mainstream judgment of social issues in online forums is often directly equivalent In “public opinion ”. However, the fact is it true? In this paper, Sina microblogging on “Wu Ying case ” discussion, for example, in these discussions, most of the content from the Sina certification plus “V ” users, and The remarks to forward these authenticated users are produced by Sina Weibo content