论文部分内容阅读
由案件提出的事实命题或所作的事实陈述是否“事实”或“真实” ,取决于两方面 :一是命题或陈述关涉自然意义的事实内容须具有客观实在性 ,即是“客观真实”的 ;二是命题或陈述关涉社会意义的事实内容须具有法律正当性 ,即是“主观真实”的。“客观真实”在法律上有一评价标准 ,依经验实证的证明形式来证明 ,此法律标准就是诉讼证明的盖然性标准 ;而“主观真实”须在公正程序保障下 ,通过对话与沟通来达成 ,是人们普遍认可的法律价值判断上的“共识事实”。因此 ,诉讼证明的标准必定是“法律真实”标准
Whether the factual proposition or the factual statement made by the case is “factual” or “real” depends on two aspects. First, the factual content of the proposition or statement concerning the natural meaning must be objective and real, that is, “objective and true”; Second, the factual content of propositions or statements concerning social significance must be legally justified, that is, “subjectively true”. The “objective reality” has an evaluation standard in law, which is proved by empirical evidence to prove that this legal standard is a prescient standard of litigation proof. The “subjective truth” must be achieved through dialogue and communication under the guarantor of fair procedure. People generally agree on the legal value of judgments on the “consensus.” Therefore, the standard proof of litigation must be “legal truth” standard