论文部分内容阅读
作为在现代性批判中反思艺术的哲人,卢梭立足于“回归自然”的思想以德性和自由的概念对其他启蒙运动思想家的戏剧艺术观进行了责难。然而,他批判戏剧(悲剧)艺术时采用的古典主义的言说方式所体现出的民粹主义道德原则,既表明了卢梭建构“道德理想国”的积极性,又凸显了其美学言说方式的局限性。本文拟以卢梭对悲剧“卡塔西斯说”的问难为切入点,通过梳理其悲剧批评观的历史发展线索,发现其戏剧理论中所承袭的柏拉图主义情愫。
As a philosopher who reflects on the art of criticism of modernity, Rousseau bases his criticism on the theatrical concepts of the other Enlightenment thinkers based on the idea of virtue and freedom based on the idea of “returning to nature.” However, he criticized the populist moral principles embodied in the classicistic way of speech used in the art of drama (tragedy), not only showing the enthusiasm of Rousseau in building “the ideal country of morality” but also highlighting the limitations of his aesthetic approach Sex. This paper intends to Rousseau ’s question on the tragedy “Cartasis ” as the starting point, by combing the historical development of his tragedy criticism of clues and found the Platonic sentiment inherited in his dramatic theory.