论文部分内容阅读
美国耶鲁大学法文系教授昂利·拜尔为编辑法国大学派文学批评家居斯塔夫·朗松的文学批评集《方法、批评及文学史》写的导言中说:“文学批评家在身后五十年或一百年,仍有一代又一代的学人对其作品进行研读和利用的非常少见。文学史家的著述在半个世纪以后,能不被人看成是陈旧得可笑、散发着时代偏见和派系成见的臭味、论证依据很不充分的,就更加少见。”他还说:“十分伟大的评论家从来没有过,也许将来也永远不会产生。他们当中最博学的也永远抵不上一个真正的诗人或者真正的小说家;最优秀的绘画评论家或者音乐评论家都早在那些画家和音乐家被人
Nelly Bayer, a professor of French at the Yale University in the United States, wrote an introduction to “Methods, Criticism and Literary History,” written by literary critic Homer Langson of the French school, “Lessons of literature critics are behind us.” In a decade or a hundred years, there are still very few generations of scholars who study and use their works.The writings of literary historians cannot be seen as ridiculously old and exude an era after half a century. The stench of prejudice and factional prejudice and the arguments for argumentation are not enough, and it is even rarer.“ He also said: ”Very great critics never lived. Maybe in the future it will never happen. The most learned of them will always arrive. Not a true poet or real novelist; the best paint critics or music critics were already painters and musicians.