论文部分内容阅读
相比于非金融企业,银行由于其业务的专业性和复杂性,信息不对称问题更为突出,从而对信息披露和透明度要求更高。同时,银行是一个经营和管理风险的机构,对其风险管理和内部控制更是要高要求。公司治理的评价历来是难题,仅以公开资料为评价依据更加困难,本报告暂从三个方面来评判:即独立董事占比(人数)/外部监事占比、股东大会/董事会/监事会召开次数、是否上市公司,以此来评价银行公司治理是否规范。
Compared with non-financial enterprises, due to the professionalism and complexity of their businesses, banks have become more prominent about information asymmetry, which requires more information disclosure and transparency. At the same time, a bank is a body that manages and manages risks. It requires even more risk management and internal controls. The evaluation of corporate governance has always been a difficult problem. It is more difficult to evaluate the basis of public information alone. This report tentatively evaluates from three aspects: the proportion of independent directors / number of external supervisors, the number of general meetings, board meetings and board meetings , Whether listed companies, in order to assess whether the standardization of bank corporate governance.