论文部分内容阅读
本文是对清华大学教授葛兆光新著《中国思想史》第一卷的学术评论。文章认为 ,葛先生“重写”思想史的基本路子即以论带史、以今视昔、以文领义 ,而“基本路子只有一条 ,一分为三 ,乃是方便说法”。事实上 ,思想史领域本来就别有洞天 ,“葛先生自许的突破之处 ,不过是划地为牢 ,然后纵身一跃 ,作突破状而已。”文章还批评了《中国思想史》中存在的理路不清、用词不当的一些“大议论”。本文作者总结道 :如果要我用一句话来评论这本书 ,我将说 :“在这本号称‘思想史’的书里 ,我看不到历史上的思想和知识 ,我只看到现在一位中国人葛兆光的‘思想’”。
This article is a review of the first volume of the history of Chinese thought by Ge Zhaoguang, a professor at Tsinghua University. The article holds that Ge’s basic principle of “rewriting” the history of ideas is based on the history of the history of the history of the history of literature. Nowadays, it is regarded as the past and the literary gentry. However, “there is only one basic path and one is divided into three, which is convenient.” In fact, the field of the field of thought history is inherently unique: “The breakthrough Ge himself makes in his approval is merely a jail and then a jerk.” The article also criticizes the existence of “history of Chinese thought” Lack of rationale, some inappropriate words “big argument.” The author concludes: If I would like to comment on this book in one sentence, I will say: “I can not see historical thoughts and knowledge in this book called ’History of Thoughts’ Ge Zhaoguang, a Chinese ”thought."