论文部分内容阅读
在方志的发展过程中,对方志的研究对象,方志界曾进行过多方面的探讨。历史上有“地理派”与“历史派”之争,近年来有“资料性著述”、“百科体”的讨论。应当肯定,这些探讨都在一定范围内做出了各自的贡献,推动了方志学理论研究的发展和志书的编纂实践活动。但是也应该指出以往的讨论,或囿于狭窄的范围,或偏重于具体编纂方法的研讨,而真正论及方志学最重要的理论问题——研究对象的却很少。现代科学告诉我们,一门科学的存
In the process of the development of the chorography, the research object of chorography has been discussed in many aspects by the chorographers. In history, there is a dispute between “geography” and “history school”. In recent years, there have been discussions on “informative writings” and “encyclopedia”. It should be affirmed that all these discussions made their respective contributions within a certain range and promoted the development of the study of the theory of chihrs and the compilation and practice of chorography. However, we should also point out the discussion in the past, or narrow the scope or focus on the specific method of compilation of research, and the real theory of the most important theoretical issues - the study of the object is very small. Modern science tells us that a science exists