论文部分内容阅读
行政裁量模式的法经济学分析表明,不能寄望于通过完善立法完全解决行政裁量问题,但可以通过立法缩小裁量范围,规范裁量程序。司法控制模式自身有成本较高、适用范围有限以及司法裁量带有主观性等不足,鉴于其中立地位和强制力,仍然可以用来加强对行政裁量合法性及合理性的审查。行政控制模式具有内生性、同步性和专业性强等优势,考虑到其控制主体和控制对象合二为一的特性,必须加强内部分权、建立裁量基准、遵循行政惯例以及加强行政责任机制。最后,为了弥补外在控制模式的不足,必须充分利用行政伦理控制模式以确保行政裁量不被滥用。
The legal and economic analysis of administrative discretion mode shows that we can not expect to completely solve the administrative discretion problem through improving legislation, but we can reduce the scope of discretion through legislation and regulate the discretionary procedure. Judicial control mode itself has the disadvantages of higher cost, limited scope of application and subjectivity of judicial discretion. Due to its neutrality and coercive power, the mode of judicial control can still be used to strengthen the review of the legitimacy and rationality of administrative discretion. Administrative control mode has the advantages of endogeneity, synchronicity and professionalism. Taking into account the characteristics of its control subjects and control objects, it is necessary to strengthen internal decentralization, establish discretionary benchmarks, follow administrative practices and strengthen administrative responsibility mechanisms. Finally, in order to make up for the lack of external control model, we must make full use of the administrative ethics control model to ensure that administrative discretion is not abused.