论文部分内容阅读
在民事审判实践中,一审法官和案件的当事人经常对二审或者再审法院将案件发回重审的程序公正性提出质疑,同时对民事案件重审程序中遇到的增加诉讼请求、提起反诉、举证规则等相关程序问题的处理,存在不同的观点。因发回重审的法律制度源于上级法院的监督权,如果一旦发回重审的不当,当事人又得重复诉讼,造成资源浪费。本文通过对重审民事案件法律特征的分析,探析发回重审事由和重审民事案件独立性审理程序。
In the practice of civil trial, the judge of the first instance and the parties to the case often challenge the fairness of the procedure of retrial of the case by the second instance or the court of retrial. At the same time, they also raise the number of litigation requests, counterclaims, rules of evidence, etc. encountered in the retrial procedure of civil cases Related procedural issues, there are different points of view. Due to the legal system of sending back to retrial from the supervisory power of the higher court, if sent back to the retrial of improper, the parties have to repeat the litigation, resulting in waste of resources. By analyzing the legal features of retrial civil cases, this article probes into the procedure of sending back retrial cases and reviewing the independence of civil cases.