论文部分内容阅读
近年来,对早前寒武纪地质的兴趣越益增大,特别对早前寒武纪的绿岩带的杂岩及活动带的杂岩的文章较多。“绿岩带”和“活动带”的术语及概念在苏联的文献中广泛采用。然而在许多著作中,对这些术语的解释实质上和国外文献是不一样的。在某些情况下,对“绿岩带”和“绿岩岩系”;“带”—“坳陷”;“活动带”—“变质带”等术语是划等号的。应该指出,除大地构造以外,具有重要金属成矿意义的就是“绿岩带”。考虑到对波罗的地盾,阿尔丹和乌克兰地盾的划分趋势,以及根据金属成矿的情况,对“绿岩带”提出了特别的要求。
In recent years, interest in Early Precambrian geology has been increasing, especially for the precambrian greenstone belt complexes and active belt complexes. The terms and concepts of “green rock band” and “active band” are widely used in the Soviet literature. However, in many books, the interpretation of these terms is essentially different from that of foreign literature. In some cases, the terms “green belt” and “green rock”; “belt” - “depression”; “activity belt” - “metamorphic belt” are equated. It should be pointed out that in addition to the geotectonics, the “greenstone belt” has the significance of metallogenic significance. Taking into account the trends in the division of the Baltic Shield, the Ardens and Ukrainian shields, and the metallogenic conditions, special requirements are placed on the Green Belt.