论文部分内容阅读
日前，沪上法院在审理一起劳动争议纠纷案时，首次将电子邮件作为定案的有效证据，这种操作，在全国司法审判中尚属首例。故而引起了新闻媒体的极大关注，同时也引起了沪上广大法律工作者的兴趣：电子邮件究竟能否作为证据 ?电子邮件的真伪究竟应如何来判断 ?2001年 1月 18日，上海《法学》月刊社邀请了复旦大学、华东政法学院等一些民法、民诉法专家、学者，就本案及本案所引申出的一些法律问题展开了深入的研讨。现将研讨观点综述如下。
Recently, the court in Shanghai in the trial of a dispute over labor disputes, the first time as an e-mail verdict valid evidence, this operation is the first case in the national judicial trial. It has aroused great concern of the news media. At the same time, it also aroused the interest of a large number of legal practitioners in Shanghai: Whether electronic mail can serve as evidence? How should the authenticity of electronic mail be judged? On January 18, 2001, Shanghai “Law” monthly magazine invited Fudan University, East China University of Political Science and Law and some other civil law, Civil Procedure Law experts and scholars, the case and the case of some legal issues extended in-depth discussion. The discussion point of view is summarized below.