论文部分内容阅读
当事人在诉讼中主张适用习惯规则是民间习惯进入司法的前提条件。在司法中,只有被证实的习惯才具有司法适用性,才能作为法官的判决依据。习惯的证明义务应当由提出主张的当事人承担,对方当事人以及法官不负证明义务。在现有的证明方式中,当事人的举证只能依靠民间权威或者专家学者的证人证言,以及某些民间习惯方面的权威性研究成果和调查报告。对众所周知的习惯,当事人可以有条件的免除证明责任。
It is a prerequisite for folk to enter the judiciary that the parties advocate the application of customary rules in litigation. In the judiciary, only the habit proved to have judicial applicability can be used as a judge’s basis. The customary burden of proof shall be borne by the party who made the claim and the other party and the judge shall not be held liable for the certificate. In the existing proof methods, the parties’ evidence can only rely on the witness testimony of civil authorities or experts and scholars as well as authoritative research results and investigation reports of some folk customs. For the well-known habits, the parties can be exempt from the burden of proof.